T.A.M.I. Examples

One manuscript passage. Three editorial reports. Each tier reads the same scene and delivers something different — not in quality, but in depth. Read the passage, then see what each level of attention finds in it.

Original Manuscript
Scene Four: THE CAT / THE RANT
Scene Four: THE CAT / THE RANT The bathroom was a sterile vacuum. The fluorescent light from the medicine cabinet buzzed—a thin, electric needle of sound that pierced the flat, clinical glare reflecting off the tiles. The scent of bleach was an abrasive weight in the air, stinging the back of Michael's throat and drying the mucous membranes of his nose. He stared into the mirror. He did not see a face; he saw a series of uncalibrated surfaces. His skin was a raw, uniform pink from the scrubbing, but the internal pressure remained. He reached for his toothbrush. The bristles were stiff, unyielding against his thumb as he flicked them. Snap. Snap. Snap. "She wasn't even that old," Michael spat. The words were jagged, lacking the usual rhythmic control. "And that bastard killed her. I'll prove them wrong. I'll correct the record."
Author's Report
£5 / 1,000 words

This is genuinely unsettling work — and I mean that as a compliment. You've written a scene that gets under the skin not through gore or melodrama, but through the particular texture of a mind that's come unmoored.

  • Michael's voice has a quality I'd call clinical mania — the language of systems, audits, calibration, correction
  • The toothbrush snap — Snap. Snap. Snap. — is one of your best moments
  • Trust the image — the metaphor that follows sometimes deflates the tension you've built
  • Michael is a genuinely disturbing creation because he's coherent in his incoherence
Read full report →
Standard Audit
£10 / 1,000 words

I read this scene twice — once quickly, the way a reader would, and once slowly, the way an editor has to. Both reads confirmed the same thing: you're doing something genuinely difficult here, and you're mostly pulling it off. You're writing a character whose psychology is the prose style itself. Michael doesn't just have a worldview — his worldview is the sentence. That's a hard target to hit, and you're hitting it more often than not. Let me tell you what's working, what needs attention, and where the real craft decisions lie.

  • "Retinal bleed superimposed over the bathroom mirror" is the scene's most interesting invention — it signals that what follows is not quite memory, not quite hallucination, but something in between. That's exactly right for this character.
  • The Snap. Snap. Snap. of the toothbrush bristles is your best micro-moment. It's rhythmically placed, physical, and earns the dialogue that follows. That's instinctive structural thinking — trust it more.
  • "The Audit" is capitalised and arrives without scaffolding. It lands as a typo rather than a revelation of character. Surface it deliberately, or move it to a moment where its weight can register.
  • The closing line — "The hunt had begun. The record was ready for final correction." — is clean, cold, and earned. You let the character's language do the moral work, which is the correct instinct.
Read full report →
Deep Edit
£20 / 1,000 words

I've read this scene twice now, and I want to start by saying something plainly: this is doing a lot of things right that are genuinely difficult to pull off. The unreliable narrator who doesn't know he's unreliable, the sensory architecture of paranoia, the way memory and present-tense action bleed into each other without losing the reader entirely — these are hard craft problems, and you're solving most of them. What follows is where I think the scene can become as precise as Michael believes himself to be.

  • Michael's interiority runs on clinical-technical vocabulary deployed as emotional armour — "uncalibrated surfaces," "128 bpm," "neutralized the evidence." The language is his attempt to impose control on experience that is actively overwhelming him. That's not a stylistic quirk; that's characterisation doing double duty as prose style.
  • "The Red Slap" as a section break pulls the reader out of Michael's consciousness. Michael doesn't think in subheadings. Internalise it — "He had a name for it. The Red Slap." — and it deepens his characterisation as someone who has built an internal taxonomy of his own trauma.
  • The emotional escalation plateaus in the middle. Julian's "fingers began to squeeze" should hit harder than his adjusting his glasses, but both are given similar weight and sentence rhythm. The peak moment needs to be physically distinct from the approach.
  • "His body a shadow reclaimed by the night" is slightly out of register. Replace with voice-consistent language: "No lights. No profile. Correctly positioned." — the satisfaction of a man executing a procedure.
Read full report →
Full Audit
£30 / 1,000 words

Before a single line is touched, let me name what this author is doing, because it's distinctive enough to be a genuine literary signature. The voice operates as a contaminated clinical register. The prose mimics the language of systems, audits, calibration, and mechanical process — but the machinery is Michael's psychology, not the world's reality. He doesn't feel rage; he experiences "uncalibrated" control. He doesn't watch a cat die; he watches "a mechanical breakdown finally audited and closed." The horror of the scene is precisely that Michael's language is tidying what his mind cannot process.

  • "Too steady" is a masterclass in unreliable narration compressed to two words. The em-dash creates the pause of Michael's interpretation — he watches, he processes, he decides what the steadiness means. A reader who trusts Julian will read steadiness as composure. A reader inside Michael's paranoia will read it as Michael does. The text doesn't adjudicate. This is the scene's most sophisticated moment of craft.
  • "A calculated application of pressure" is the scene's most chilling sentence. It's three words longer than it needs to be, which is exactly right. The clinical elaboration of "squeeze" into "calculated application of pressure" makes it worse, not better. A squeeze is something a person does. A "calculated application of pressure" is something a machine does to a system it's shutting down.
  • "They laugh at the squeeze" is the scene's best line of dialogue — it only works because everything before it has been built correctly. "The squeeze" names Julian's act in Michael's vocabulary, and "they laugh" collapses Paula's giggle and Julian's steadiness into four words that reveal Michael's complete delusional architecture.
  • Seven specific line edits identified, including replacing "mucous membranes" (breaks clinical register in the wrong direction) and restructuring the memory sequence with one grounding beat to prevent the bathroom frame from dissolving.
Read full report →

That’s what T.A.M.I. finds in someone else’s work. Imagine what it would find in yours.

Submit Your Manuscript